How Stifling Debate Around Race, Genes and IQ Can Do Harm


I would like to thank Jam Kraprayoon, Nathan Cofnas, Benjamin Winegard and one anonymous reviewer for comments that improved the manuscript.

  1. Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedford, A. (2015). Serious case review into child sexual exploitation in Oxfordshire: from the experiences of children A, B, C, D, E, and F. Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children Board, published online.Google Scholar
  3. Block, N. J., & Dworkin, G. (1974). IQ, heritability and inequality, part 2. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4, 40–99.Google Scholar
  4. Burroughs, V. J., Maxey, R. W., & Levy, R. (2002). Racial and ethnic differences in response to medicines: towards individualized pharmaceutical treatment. Journal of the National Medical Association, 94, 1–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Carl, N. (2017). Ethnicity and electoral fraud in Britain. Electoral Studies, 50, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cofnas, N. (2016). Science is not always “self-correcting”: fact-value conflation and the study of intelligence. Foundations of Science, 21, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cofnas, N. (2017). Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy: a critical analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s theory. Human Nature, early online view.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99, 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway, L.G., Repke, M.A. & Houck, S.C. (2017). Donald Trump as a cultural revolt against perceived communication restriction: priming political correctness norms causes more trump support. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2195-3325, published online.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, B. B. (1978). The moralistic fallacy. Nature, 272, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dillow, C. (2018). Genes & The Left. Stumbling and mumbling, January 16, published online.Google Scholar
  12. Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., & Haidt, J. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 38, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dworkin, R. (1981a). What is equality? Part 1: equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283–345.Google Scholar
  14. Dworkin, R. (1981b). What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 185–246.Google Scholar
  15. Epstein, D. (2014). The sports gene: inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Fingerhut, H. (2016). In ‘political correctness’ debate, most Americans think too many people are easily offended. Pew Research, published online.Google Scholar
  17. Flynn, J. (2017). Academic freedom and race: You ought not to believe what you think may be true. Journal of Criminal Justice, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Shikaki, M. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. PNAS, 104, 7357–7360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillborn, D. (2016). Softly, softly: genetics, intelligence and the hidden racism of the new geneism. Journal of Education Policy, 31, 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg, Z. (2018). Serwer error: misunderstanding Trump voters. Quillette, January 1, published online.Google Scholar
  21. Gottfredson, L. S. (2010). Lessons in academic freedom as lived experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: intelligence and class structure in American life. New York City, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, W.D., Marioni, R.E., Maghzian, O., Ritchie, S.J., Hagenaars, S.P. et al. (2018). A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, published online.Google Scholar
  24. House of Commons. (2013). Child sexual exploitation and the response to localised grooming: follow-up, Second Report of Session 2013–14. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, published online.Google Scholar
  25. Hume, D. (1739). A treatise of human nature. London, UK: John Noon.Google Scholar
  26. Jay, A. (2013). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham. Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, published online.Google Scholar
  27. Jeffrey, A.J. & Shackelford, T.K. (2017). Moral positions on publishing race differences in intelligence. Journal of Criminal Justice, in press.Google Scholar
  28. Jensen, A. (1972). Genetics and education. New York City, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York City, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  30. Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting ambition: sociobiology and the quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Knight, C. (2013). Luck egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass, 8(10), 924–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kourany, J. A. (2016). Should some knowledge be forbidden? The case of cognitive differences research. Philosophy of Science, 83, 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lamont, J. & Favor, C. (2017). Distributive justice: equality of opportunity and luck egalitarianism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, published online.Google Scholar
  34. Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nyborg, H. (2011). The greatest collective scientific fraud of the 20th century: the demolition of differential psychology and eugenics. Mankind Quarterly, 51, 241–268.Google Scholar
  38. Pettigrew, T.F. (2017). Social psychological perspectives on trump supporters. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2195-3325, published online.Google Scholar
  39. Pickles, Sir Eric. (2016). Securing the ballot: report of Sir Eric Pickles’ review into electoral fraud. UK Government, published online.Google Scholar
  40. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York City, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  41. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Plomin, R., & Deary, I. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rafiq, H. & Adil, M. (2017). Group based child sexual exploitation—dissecting grooming gangs. Quilliam Foundation, published online.Google Scholar
  44. Ramamoorthy, A., Pacanowski, M. A., Bull, J., & Zhang, L. (2015). Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 97, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reich, D. (2017). How genetics is changing our understanding of ‘race’. New York Times, March 23, published online.Google Scholar
  46. Risse, M., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Racial profiling. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32, 131–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Riley, J. L. (2015). Please stop helping us: how liberals make it harder for blacks to succeed. New York City, NY: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  48. Robinson, M. R., Hemani, G., Medina-Gomez, C., Mezzavilla, M., Esko, T., et al. (2015). Population genetic differentiation of height and body mass index across Europe. Nature Genetics, 47, 1357–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rushton, J. P. (1996). Political correctness and the study of racial differences. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 235–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaffner, B.F., MacWilliams, M. & Nteta, T. (2017). Explaining white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: the sobering role of racism and sexism. Working Paper, published online.Google Scholar
  52. Sesardić, N. (2005). Making sense of heritability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sesardić, N. (2018). Is racial profiling a legitimate strategy in the fight against violent crime? Philosophia, 1–19.Google Scholar
  54. Singer, P. (2007). Should we talk about race and intelligence? Project Syndicate, November 1, published online.Google Scholar
  55. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sniekers, S., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Jansen, P. R., Coleman, J. R. I., et al. (2017). Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nature Genetics, 49, 1107–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soave, R. (2016). Yes, political correctness helped elect trump: what skeptics need to know. Reason, Hit & Run Blog, December 19, published online.Google Scholar
  58. Stranger, A. (2017). Understanding the angry mob at Middlebury that gave me a concussion. The New York Times, March 13, published online.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, J. S., & Ellis, G. R. (2002). Racial differences in responses to drug treatment: implications for pharmacotherapy of heart failure. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turchin, M. C., Chiang, C. W. K., Palmer, C. D., Sankararaman, S., Reich, D., et al. (2012). Evidence of widespread selection on standing variation in Europe at height-associated SNPs. Nature Genetics, 44, 1015–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyrell, J., Jones, S. E., Beaumont, R., Astley, C. M., Lovell, R., et al. (2016). Height, body mass index, and socioeconomic status: Mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank. BMJ, 352, 1–10.Google Scholar
  63. Wade, N. (2014). A troublesome inheritance: genes, race and human history. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Warne, R. T., Astle, M. C., & Hill, J. C. (2018). What do undergraduates learn about human intelligence? An analysis of introductory psychology textbooks. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Washington Post. (2016). Why I voted for Trump. Washington Post, Opinion, November 23, published online.Google Scholar
  66. Winegard, B., & Winegard, B. (2015). A social science without sacred values. Working Paper, published online.Google Scholar
  67. Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Boutwell, B. (2017). Human biological and psychological diversity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Winegard, B.M., Clark, C.J. & Hasty, C. (2018). Equalitarianism: a source of liberal bias. Working paper, published online.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, W.E. (2017). Blacks suffer when police are undermined. The News Virginian, Opinion, February 19, published online.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.