The landscape of applications today is broad. Similarly, the methods of authentication used is similarly varied. This section covers some of the login and authentication workflows used by applications today. These examples use FusionAuth as the IdP (identity provider), but any IdP could be used. You can use these articles to help architect and design the authentication system for your application.
Keep in mind that this list is not exhaustive. Most IdPs, including FusionAuth, are capable of other forms of login. Also, there are many login workflows that we do not cover here due to security concerns with those methods.
Also, these articles do not discuss the pros and cons of the different types of applications and which might be best for your needs. They focus entirely on authentication for applications. There are many articles available that cover different application types and why you should choose one over the other (such as the decision to use a native mobile application versus a responsive web application).
- Native login form - this is a form built directly into the application rather then leveraging an external login form such as OAuth
- Application backend - this is the backend of the application, not the IdP (i.e. not FusionAuth)
Traditional web application authentication
Traditional web applications (webapps) use the request and response nature of the HTTP protocol along with the URL address of the browser to provide functionality to users. Many new web applications are still implemented using this method and many existing web applications use this pattern.
There are only two HTTP methods supported by the browser in this style of application,
POST. The HTTP method informs the server what type of action the user took and how to handle the request.
Here are the options for providing login to traditional webapps.
Single-page application authentication
APIs are invoked using the
Since the browser is using
XMLHttpRequest, it can invoke all of the standard HTTP methods including
DELETE. The HTTP method helps inform the server what type of action the user took and how to handle the request.
Here are the options for providing login to SPAs.
In is important to note that while we recommend OAuth for SPAs, it causes the browser to close the SPA and navigate to the OAuth provider. Once the OAuth workflow is complete, the browser retrieves and starts the SPA again. This process might seem somewhat heavy, but the SPA should be cached in the browser making the second startup process much faster.
Native mobile application authentication
Native mobile applications are usually installed via a store and installed on the mobile device (phone, tablet, etc). These applications are started by clicking the icon on the device. The device operating system then starts the application. Once the application is started, it renders its user interface.
Native applications often call APIs to handle user interactions and input. For example, if a use clicks a button or submits a form, the application might call an API on the server. This API might be called via HTTP or some other type of protocol. Often, native applications use various libraries for making API calls simpler.
Here are the options for providing login to native mobile applications.
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: Some experts recommend that native applications (including mobile apps) use OAuth’s authorization code grant. This method works fine with many IdPs, including FusionAuth, but is not listed in this section because it is covered in the SPA and Webapp sections above. The only difference is that at the end of the OAuth workflow, the native application pulls the JWT and refresh tokens from the web-view.
FusionAuth is a flexible and secure Customer Identity and Access Management solution. FusionAuth provides registration, login, passwordless login, SSO, MFA, data search, social login, user management and much more. Best of all, you can download and try it today for free.